<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Media Player Confusion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.hact.net/2008/02/13/media-player-confusion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.hact.net/2008/02/13/media-player-confusion/</link>
	<description>Aaron Huslage's take on things</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 00:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: vm</title>
		<link>http://blog.hact.net/2008/02/13/media-player-confusion/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>vm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 10:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://huslage.wordpress.com/?p=24#comment-27</guid>
		<description>But the proper comparison for itunes is not windows media player. That one matches to quicktime. Windows Media wins! It has a -library!- Quicktime does not!

iTunes is meant to be compared against Zune software. Any other comparison is false! False! Microsoft wins! YEAHHHHHHHHHHH!

Oh wait. Right.
Let's actually hire some outside UI people test stuff and tell us what they think and then do something with it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But the proper comparison for itunes is not windows media player. That one matches to quicktime. Windows Media wins! It has a -library!- Quicktime does not!</p>
<p>iTunes is meant to be compared against Zune software. Any other comparison is false! False! Microsoft wins! YEAHHHHHHHHHHH!</p>
<p>Oh wait. Right.<br />
Let&#8217;s actually hire some outside UI people test stuff and tell us what they think and then do something with it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
