<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Aaron Huslage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.hact.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.hact.net</link>
	<description>Aaron Huslage's take on things</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 00:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on iPhone Ridiculousness 2.0 by Jason Sjobeck</title>
		<link>http://blog.hact.net/2008/07/09/iphone-ridiculousness-20/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Sjobeck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 01:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://huslage.wordpress.com/?p=43#comment-56</guid>
		<description>I wonder if ATT hates customers? It seems like they do. 

I also wonder, and think, that there is not enough choice in cellco's for the customers. I would change in a moment away from these greedy stupid corporate profiteers.

I hope that both Apple &#38; ATT get a face-ful, no an entire three-piece pin-striped business suit-ful, of egg all over themselves on this &#38; realize they are nothing without their clients, without our loyalty, without us.

I hope Android gets legs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if ATT hates customers? It seems like they do. </p>
<p>I also wonder, and think, that there is not enough choice in cellco&#8217;s for the customers. I would change in a moment away from these greedy stupid corporate profiteers.</p>
<p>I hope that both Apple &amp; ATT get a face-ful, no an entire three-piece pin-striped business suit-ful, of egg all over themselves on this &amp; realize they are nothing without their clients, without our loyalty, without us.</p>
<p>I hope Android gets legs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Netflix Confounds and Confuses by vmarks</title>
		<link>http://blog.hact.net/2008/06/18/netflix-confounds-and-confuses/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>vmarks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 20:08:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://huslage.wordpress.com/?p=41#comment-54</guid>
		<description>Dude, they did fix it. They read your blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude, they did fix it. They read your blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The &#8220;Data Portability&#8221; Hoohah by Ian</title>
		<link>http://blog.hact.net/2008/05/17/the-data-portability-hoohah/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 16:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://huslage.wordpress.com/?p=39#comment-50</guid>
		<description>Couldn't agree more, I read a lot of the echoes from the chamber but find myself smiling at the fact that such a tiny % of users can be so knowledgable about what the other 99.99% of users want(should) be doing..

EVERY single time I talk to one of my non-geek friends about the latest trend or idea they tell me a) who the hell does that and b) why the hell would I want to do that</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couldn&#8217;t agree more, I read a lot of the echoes from the chamber but find myself smiling at the fact that such a tiny % of users can be so knowledgable about what the other 99.99% of users want(should) be doing..</p>
<p>EVERY single time I talk to one of my non-geek friends about the latest trend or idea they tell me a) who the hell does that and b) why the hell would I want to do that</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The &#8220;Data Portability&#8221; Hoohah by Jason Wehmhoener</title>
		<link>http://blog.hact.net/2008/05/17/the-data-portability-hoohah/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Wehmhoener</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 02:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://huslage.wordpress.com/?p=39#comment-49</guid>
		<description>Applause!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Applause!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on California&#8217;s Gay Marriage Ruling by criticaldemocracy</title>
		<link>http://blog.hact.net/2008/05/15/californias-gay-marriage-ruling/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>criticaldemocracy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 23:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://huslage.wordpress.com/?p=38#comment-48</guid>
		<description>"Children should not be deprived of a mother or father."  How about children should not be deprived of loving active parents?  Never mind the fear tactic of calling gay marriage a threat to "traditional" marriage.  Never mind the slippery slope argument of gay marriage leading to polygamy, bestiality, pedophilia.  Never mind the oh so reliable bible quotes.  There are many areas of law effected by marriage, such as insurance, adoption, social security, taxes.  Arbitrary group discrimination crushes human potential and it is unconstitutional.  Equal protection under the law is supposed to be the american way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Children should not be deprived of a mother or father.&#8221;  How about children should not be deprived of loving active parents?  Never mind the fear tactic of calling gay marriage a threat to &#8220;traditional&#8221; marriage.  Never mind the slippery slope argument of gay marriage leading to polygamy, bestiality, pedophilia.  Never mind the oh so reliable bible quotes.  There are many areas of law effected by marriage, such as insurance, adoption, social security, taxes.  Arbitrary group discrimination crushes human potential and it is unconstitutional.  Equal protection under the law is supposed to be the american way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Comcast Hijacks Bandwidth Management by Comcast Shift a Nod to Political, Competitive Realities &#124; Favorite-Articles.com</title>
		<link>http://blog.hact.net/2008/03/27/comcast-hijacks-bandwidth-management/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>Comcast Shift a Nod to Political, Competitive Realities &#124; Favorite-Articles.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 08:54:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://huslage.wordpress.com/?p=34#comment-47</guid>
		<description>[...] Blogger Aaron Huslage says the agreement in essence is a PR ploy. The real issue is Comcast&#8217;s failure to upgrade its network. The company, he says, &#8220;has done a clever thing? by shifting the argument from the root issue, which is a lack of investment. In this view, P2P-related capacity issues are a symptom, not a cause , of the problem. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Blogger Aaron Huslage says the agreement in essence is a PR ploy. The real issue is Comcast&#8217;s failure to upgrade its network. The company, he says, &#8220;has done a clever thing? by shifting the argument from the root issue, which is a lack of investment. In this view, P2P-related capacity issues are a symptom, not a cause , of the problem. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Comcast Hijacks Bandwidth Management by Comcast Shift a Nod to Political, Competitive Realities &#124; Homeownerloanmax.com</title>
		<link>http://blog.hact.net/2008/03/27/comcast-hijacks-bandwidth-management/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>Comcast Shift a Nod to Political, Competitive Realities &#124; Homeownerloanmax.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 17:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://huslage.wordpress.com/?p=34#comment-45</guid>
		<description>[...] Blogger Aaron Huslage says the agreement in essence is a PR ploy. The real issue is Comcast&#8217;s failure to upgrade its network. The company, he says, &#8220;has done a clever thing? by shifting the argument from the root issue, which is a lack of investment. In this view, P2P-related capacity issues are a symptom, not a cause , of the problem. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Blogger Aaron Huslage says the agreement in essence is a PR ploy. The real issue is Comcast&#8217;s failure to upgrade its network. The company, he says, &#8220;has done a clever thing? by shifting the argument from the root issue, which is a lack of investment. In this view, P2P-related capacity issues are a symptom, not a cause , of the problem. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Comcast Hijacks Bandwidth Management by Comcast: Not A Member Of The Fat, Dumb Pipe Club</title>
		<link>http://blog.hact.net/2008/03/27/comcast-hijacks-bandwidth-management/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>Comcast: Not A Member Of The Fat, Dumb Pipe Club</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 07:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://huslage.wordpress.com/?p=34#comment-44</guid>
		<description>[...] My friend Aaron Huslage points out this means is that they&#8217;re still shaping traffic. I agree with that assessment. On the other hand, they are deploying DOCSIS 3.0 to roughly 20% of their service area. Since that&#8217;s going to push more bandwidth to the end user, you&#8217;d think you&#8217;d think they&#8217;d have to upgrade their core by a commensurate amount&#8211;at least in those areas. Then again, they&#8217;ve cocked things like this up before. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] My friend Aaron Huslage points out this means is that they&#8217;re still shaping traffic. I agree with that assessment. On the other hand, they are deploying DOCSIS 3.0 to roughly 20% of their service area. Since that&#8217;s going to push more bandwidth to the end user, you&#8217;d think you&#8217;d think they&#8217;d have to upgrade their core by a commensurate amount&#8211;at least in those areas. Then again, they&#8217;ve cocked things like this up before. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Baby Blog by binoculars</title>
		<link>http://blog.hact.net/2008/02/11/new-baby-blog/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>binoculars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 06:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hact.net/2008/02/11/new-baby-blog/#comment-43</guid>
		<description>This blog is simply smashing. In my humble opinion of course. As this post is rather debatable I don't think all your blog visitors are going to agree with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This blog is simply smashing. In my humble opinion of course. As this post is rather debatable I don&#8217;t think all your blog visitors are going to agree with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on [Updated] Clearwire Makes Me Sad - Part 2 by chrissey</title>
		<link>http://blog.hact.net/2008/04/01/clearwire-makes-me-sad-part-2/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>chrissey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 17:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://huslage.wordpress.com/?p=35#comment-40</guid>
		<description>I can understand Clearwire's desire to make sure that their other customers are not adversely affected by another's usage.  However, I think their customer service leaves a little to be desired, especially when we were attempting to communicate with Clearwire to help alleviate the situation!  It's not as if we were sitting over our internet connection gleefully rubbing our hands together as we hogged bandwith.  We asked for more feedback that would help us fix the problem, and it is still unclear to me why someone from Clearwire can't tell us, "Ok, it looks like on Tuesday at 11:00am traffic spiked considerably."  Instead of wanting to keep a customer and helping us with the situation, they chose to treat us like children with our hands in the cookie jar.  

It is certainly clear that we are not the type of customers Clearwire wants nor cares about because our internet usage is obviously outside their secretly established parameters.  I am certainly happy to take our business elsewhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can understand Clearwire&#8217;s desire to make sure that their other customers are not adversely affected by another&#8217;s usage.  However, I think their customer service leaves a little to be desired, especially when we were attempting to communicate with Clearwire to help alleviate the situation!  It&#8217;s not as if we were sitting over our internet connection gleefully rubbing our hands together as we hogged bandwith.  We asked for more feedback that would help us fix the problem, and it is still unclear to me why someone from Clearwire can&#8217;t tell us, &#8220;Ok, it looks like on Tuesday at 11:00am traffic spiked considerably.&#8221;  Instead of wanting to keep a customer and helping us with the situation, they chose to treat us like children with our hands in the cookie jar.  </p>
<p>It is certainly clear that we are not the type of customers Clearwire wants nor cares about because our internet usage is obviously outside their secretly established parameters.  I am certainly happy to take our business elsewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Comcast Hijacks Bandwidth Management by Comcast Shift a Nod to Political, Competitive Realities &#124; Internetcolor</title>
		<link>http://blog.hact.net/2008/03/27/comcast-hijacks-bandwidth-management/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Comcast Shift a Nod to Political, Competitive Realities &#124; Internetcolor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 10:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://huslage.wordpress.com/?p=34#comment-39</guid>
		<description>[...] Blogger Aaron Huslage says the agreement in essence is a PR ploy. The real issue is Comcast&#8217;s failure to upgrade its network. The company, he says, &#8220;has done a clever thing? by shifting the argument from the root issue, which is a lack of investment. In this view, P2P-related capacity issues are a symptom, not a cause , of the problem. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Blogger Aaron Huslage says the agreement in essence is a PR ploy. The real issue is Comcast&#8217;s failure to upgrade its network. The company, he says, &#8220;has done a clever thing? by shifting the argument from the root issue, which is a lack of investment. In this view, P2P-related capacity issues are a symptom, not a cause , of the problem. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on [Updated] Clearwire Makes Me Sad - Part 2 by PhoneBoy</title>
		<link>http://blog.hact.net/2008/04/01/clearwire-makes-me-sad-part-2/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 22:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://huslage.wordpress.com/?p=35#comment-38</guid>
		<description>Surprisingly, Clearwire is available in Gig Harbor. However, it's not in any way compelling versus Comcast or CenturyTel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surprisingly, Clearwire is available in Gig Harbor. However, it&#8217;s not in any way compelling versus Comcast or CenturyTel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Clearwire Makes Me Sad by Clearwire Makes Me Sad - Part 2 &#171; Aaron Huslage</title>
		<link>http://blog.hact.net/2008/03/18/clearwire-makes-me-sad/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Clearwire Makes Me Sad - Part 2 &#171; Aaron Huslage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 18:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://huslage.wordpress.com/?p=32#comment-37</guid>
		<description>[...] Makes Me Sad - Part&#160;2 Posted in broadband by huslage on April 1st, 2008   You may have read my earlier piece on Clearwire&#8217;s strange bandwidth management practices. Shortly after I wrote it, a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Makes Me Sad - Part&nbsp;2 Posted in broadband by huslage on April 1st, 2008   You may have read my earlier piece on Clearwire&#8217;s strange bandwidth management practices. Shortly after I wrote it, a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Comcast Hijacks Bandwidth Management by Robb Topolski</title>
		<link>http://blog.hact.net/2008/03/27/comcast-hijacks-bandwidth-management/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Robb Topolski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 17:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://huslage.wordpress.com/?p=34#comment-35</guid>
		<description>I'm yelling! 

 Just by way of re-introduction if necessary, I'm probably a key figure
 as to why we're all talking about Network Neutrality again.  I was having a
 problem uploading on Gnutella in early 2007.  I tracked it down to
 Comcast using Sandvine-injected RST packets and documented it.  Blog
 stories led to press stories which led to independent confirmation.
 And here we are today.

 Today Comcast and BitTorrent seems to have solved world hunger -- and
 I'd love nothing more than to be optimistic about it.  But I cannot
 be.  As they say on Slashdot -- show video, or it didn't happen.  This
 deal is treachery, relies on how much we can trust the word of
 Comcast, and leaves the public interests out in the cold.

 I think it's strange that anyone believes a word that Comcast says.
 This is the Comcast that:

 1. Told the FCC in 2005 that they would not degrade traffic in order
 to convince the FCC that network neutrality regulations were not
 needed.  They told the Justice Committee the same thing in 2006.

 2. Started degrading P2P traffic in 2006, and failed to
 tell anyone what they were doing.

 3. Used a system that utilized forgery, and successfully placed blame
 on the other peer instead of Comcast.

 4. Denied it when caught.

 5. Then changed their story when the denials were not believed, but
 still never came out and said what they were doing.

 6. Then they justified their actions by throwing their other
 Cable-Internet brothers and sisters under the bus with their "they do
 it too!" defense

 7. Then stealthily changed the AUP days before an FCC filing where
 they referred to the new provisions.

 8. When the changed AUP started getting press attention, they stated
 that a prominent story on Comcast.net alerted millions of visitors of
 the change and accused Marvin Ammori of crying wolf. (Google cache
 proved that nothing alerted users to the changed AUP until the day
 after the press started asking questions.)

 9. Then they packed the Harvard FCC hearing.

 This company has not demonstrated that you can trust its promises, nor
 can you believe its assertions. Comcast just used BitTorrent Inc. as a
 tool to try and defang the FCC.

 BitTorrent Inc. is a content provider. Vuze, who actually DID make a
 complaint and petition to the FCC, is a competitor. Neither
 BitTorrent, Vuze, nor Comcast represents the interests of 12 million
 Comcast users nor the The Internet Society nor the public. And this
 middle-of-the-night deal was made without their input.

 Nothing has changed. The RST interference continues. It was a wrongful
 act. BitTorrent Inc. has no right making a deal with Comcast allowing
 it to continue to commit wrongful acts until it finally decides it is
 ready to stop. The correct relief is to stop the interference
 immediately and to FULLY DISCLOSE what it did and to accept
 responsibility for those actions. (Even today, Comcast's Policy VP
 refused to answer questions about the interference.)

 Their word is worthless. Until the interference stops, I have no
 reason to believe it will. Until either meaningful competition returns
 to broadband, or until sufficient government regulation enforces
 Network Neutrality, we have no reason to think that this agreement
 will last through the night.

 Robb Topolski</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m yelling! </p>
<p> Just by way of re-introduction if necessary, I&#8217;m probably a key figure<br />
 as to why we&#8217;re all talking about Network Neutrality again.  I was having a<br />
 problem uploading on Gnutella in early 2007.  I tracked it down to<br />
 Comcast using Sandvine-injected RST packets and documented it.  Blog<br />
 stories led to press stories which led to independent confirmation.<br />
 And here we are today.</p>
<p> Today Comcast and BitTorrent seems to have solved world hunger &#8212; and<br />
 I&#8217;d love nothing more than to be optimistic about it.  But I cannot<br />
 be.  As they say on Slashdot &#8212; show video, or it didn&#8217;t happen.  This<br />
 deal is treachery, relies on how much we can trust the word of<br />
 Comcast, and leaves the public interests out in the cold.</p>
<p> I think it&#8217;s strange that anyone believes a word that Comcast says.<br />
 This is the Comcast that:</p>
<p> 1. Told the FCC in 2005 that they would not degrade traffic in order<br />
 to convince the FCC that network neutrality regulations were not<br />
 needed.  They told the Justice Committee the same thing in 2006.</p>
<p> 2. Started degrading P2P traffic in 2006, and failed to<br />
 tell anyone what they were doing.</p>
<p> 3. Used a system that utilized forgery, and successfully placed blame<br />
 on the other peer instead of Comcast.</p>
<p> 4. Denied it when caught.</p>
<p> 5. Then changed their story when the denials were not believed, but<br />
 still never came out and said what they were doing.</p>
<p> 6. Then they justified their actions by throwing their other<br />
 Cable-Internet brothers and sisters under the bus with their &#8220;they do<br />
 it too!&#8221; defense</p>
<p> 7. Then stealthily changed the AUP days before an FCC filing where<br />
 they referred to the new provisions.</p>
<p> 8. When the changed AUP started getting press attention, they stated<br />
 that a prominent story on Comcast.net alerted millions of visitors of<br />
 the change and accused Marvin Ammori of crying wolf. (Google cache<br />
 proved that nothing alerted users to the changed AUP until the day<br />
 after the press started asking questions.)</p>
<p> 9. Then they packed the Harvard FCC hearing.</p>
<p> This company has not demonstrated that you can trust its promises, nor<br />
 can you believe its assertions. Comcast just used BitTorrent Inc. as a<br />
 tool to try and defang the FCC.</p>
<p> BitTorrent Inc. is a content provider. Vuze, who actually DID make a<br />
 complaint and petition to the FCC, is a competitor. Neither<br />
 BitTorrent, Vuze, nor Comcast represents the interests of 12 million<br />
 Comcast users nor the The Internet Society nor the public. And this<br />
 middle-of-the-night deal was made without their input.</p>
<p> Nothing has changed. The RST interference continues. It was a wrongful<br />
 act. BitTorrent Inc. has no right making a deal with Comcast allowing<br />
 it to continue to commit wrongful acts until it finally decides it is<br />
 ready to stop. The correct relief is to stop the interference<br />
 immediately and to FULLY DISCLOSE what it did and to accept<br />
 responsibility for those actions. (Even today, Comcast&#8217;s Policy VP<br />
 refused to answer questions about the interference.)</p>
<p> Their word is worthless. Until the interference stops, I have no<br />
 reason to believe it will. Until either meaningful competition returns<br />
 to broadband, or until sufficient government regulation enforces<br />
 Network Neutrality, we have no reason to think that this agreement<br />
 will last through the night.</p>
<p> Robb Topolski</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Comcast Hijacks Bandwidth Management by Jason Sjobeck</title>
		<link>http://blog.hact.net/2008/03/27/comcast-hijacks-bandwidth-management/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Sjobeck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 05:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://huslage.wordpress.com/?p=34#comment-34</guid>
		<description>Wonder what this means?

http://www.technologyreview.com/Wire/20483/?nlid=970</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wonder what this means?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.technologyreview.com/Wire/20483/?nlid=970" rel="nofollow">http://www.technologyreview.com/Wire/20483/?nlid=970</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Clearwire Makes Me Sad by Sjobeck</title>
		<link>http://blog.hact.net/2008/03/18/clearwire-makes-me-sad/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Sjobeck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 06:46:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://huslage.wordpress.com/?p=32#comment-31</guid>
		<description>I for one am glad that they are throttling you since I am down here in PDX &#38; I do not want my computers to catch what cold yours have since the bits are obviously contagious. Further, I appreciate and congratulate Clearwire's dilligence in protecting me from you &#38; your wasting of Amerika's most precious unnatural resource, our free bits. I hope Clearwire invades your computers with a coalation of the willing to topple you &#38; your bytes of mass destruction. I say you are with Clearwire or against Clearwire. If you are against Clearwire, then you are just as good as a being behind the great firewall of China. In fact, I hope Clearwire bribes other ISP's in to allowing Clearwire to use their servers as a staging ground for their bytes to amass all around you before they invade you. I hope in five years from today (as a matter of fact) we look back upon this action as the success we were always going to be told it would be.

Freedom aint free, brutha.

Yeeeeeeeeeeeha!

sj0beck</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I for one am glad that they are throttling you since I am down here in PDX &amp; I do not want my computers to catch what cold yours have since the bits are obviously contagious. Further, I appreciate and congratulate Clearwire&#8217;s dilligence in protecting me from you &amp; your wasting of Amerika&#8217;s most precious unnatural resource, our free bits. I hope Clearwire invades your computers with a coalation of the willing to topple you &amp; your bytes of mass destruction. I say you are with Clearwire or against Clearwire. If you are against Clearwire, then you are just as good as a being behind the great firewall of China. In fact, I hope Clearwire bribes other ISP&#8217;s in to allowing Clearwire to use their servers as a staging ground for their bytes to amass all around you before they invade you. I hope in five years from today (as a matter of fact) we look back upon this action as the success we were always going to be told it would be.</p>
<p>Freedom aint free, brutha.</p>
<p>Yeeeeeeeeeeeha!</p>
<p>sj0beck</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Clearwire Makes Me Sad by ikisai</title>
		<link>http://blog.hact.net/2008/03/18/clearwire-makes-me-sad/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>ikisai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 23:09:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://huslage.wordpress.com/?p=32#comment-30</guid>
		<description>I feel for you as I surf/download and generally have away at T'Internet at 20MB speeds for approx $75 a month.....at least there are still some good things about living in the UK :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel for you as I surf/download and generally have away at T&#8217;Internet at 20MB speeds for approx $75 a month&#8230;..at least there are still some good things about living in the UK <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Clearwire Makes Me Sad by Michael</title>
		<link>http://blog.hact.net/2008/03/18/clearwire-makes-me-sad/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 23:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://huslage.wordpress.com/?p=32#comment-29</guid>
		<description>This is a perfect example of why I am perfectly fine paying a premium for Speakeasy, even though Comcast in our area is a lot cheaper.  I do wish I got ADSL2 here though - hopefully soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a perfect example of why I am perfectly fine paying a premium for Speakeasy, even though Comcast in our area is a lot cheaper.  I do wish I got ADSL2 here though - hopefully soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Media Player Confusion by vm</title>
		<link>http://blog.hact.net/2008/02/13/media-player-confusion/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>vm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 10:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://huslage.wordpress.com/?p=24#comment-27</guid>
		<description>But the proper comparison for itunes is not windows media player. That one matches to quicktime. Windows Media wins! It has a -library!- Quicktime does not!

iTunes is meant to be compared against Zune software. Any other comparison is false! False! Microsoft wins! YEAHHHHHHHHHHH!

Oh wait. Right.
Let's actually hire some outside UI people test stuff and tell us what they think and then do something with it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But the proper comparison for itunes is not windows media player. That one matches to quicktime. Windows Media wins! It has a -library!- Quicktime does not!</p>
<p>iTunes is meant to be compared against Zune software. Any other comparison is false! False! Microsoft wins! YEAHHHHHHHHHHH!</p>
<p>Oh wait. Right.<br />
Let&#8217;s actually hire some outside UI people test stuff and tell us what they think and then do something with it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Baby Blog by Jason Sjobeck</title>
		<link>http://blog.hact.net/2008/02/11/new-baby-blog/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Sjobeck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 08:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hact.net/2008/02/11/new-baby-blog/#comment-26</guid>
		<description>Super congratulations! A human, how unexpected. How great. I look forward to following your progress.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Super congratulations! A human, how unexpected. How great. I look forward to following your progress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cars should talk to Roads by Michael Huslage</title>
		<link>http://blog.hact.net/2008/02/06/cars-should-talk-to-roads/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Huslage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 16:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hact.net/2008/02/06/cars-should-talk-to-roads/#comment-25</guid>
		<description>No carbon footprint if the vehicles are virtual, solar powered, and fly.  Call me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No carbon footprint if the vehicles are virtual, solar powered, and fly.  Call me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Microsoft Thoughts by Ryan</title>
		<link>http://blog.hact.net/2008/02/04/microsoft-thoughts/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 21:18:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://huslage.wordpress.com/?p=20#comment-24</guid>
		<description>On a happier note, you ever get those AUDIX samples??

We're all dead in 20 years....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On a happier note, you ever get those AUDIX samples??</p>
<p>We&#8217;re all dead in 20 years&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cars should talk to Roads by Alec Saunders</title>
		<link>http://blog.hact.net/2008/02/06/cars-should-talk-to-roads/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Alec Saunders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 00:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hact.net/2008/02/06/cars-should-talk-to-roads/#comment-23</guid>
		<description>one could argue that jurisdictions with tire taxes are achieving this.  Drive more, wear out tires quicker, pay more tax.  Not on the same scale as what you're talking about, but definitely a road / fuel consumption tax.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>one could argue that jurisdictions with tire taxes are achieving this.  Drive more, wear out tires quicker, pay more tax.  Not on the same scale as what you&#8217;re talking about, but definitely a road / fuel consumption tax.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Microsoft Thoughts by alan</title>
		<link>http://blog.hact.net/2008/02/04/microsoft-thoughts/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 21:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://huslage.wordpress.com/?p=20#comment-22</guid>
		<description>Great post Aaron.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post Aaron.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Microsoft Thoughts by Imran</title>
		<link>http://blog.hact.net/2008/02/04/microsoft-thoughts/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Imran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 19:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://huslage.wordpress.com/?p=20#comment-21</guid>
		<description>Process fetishism - I like it :)

You could almost search &#38; replace 'Microsoft' with 'Orange' or 'France Telecom' and the article would read like the last few years of my career.

Seems dominance tends to conservatism...next up Google?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Process fetishism - I like it <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>You could almost search &amp; replace &#8216;Microsoft&#8217; with &#8216;Orange&#8217; or &#8216;France Telecom&#8217; and the article would read like the last few years of my career.</p>
<p>Seems dominance tends to conservatism&#8230;next up Google?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Career Stagnation by Horace Tidas</title>
		<link>http://blog.hact.net/2007/12/13/career-stagnation/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Horace Tidas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 05:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hact.net/2007/12/13/career-stagnation/#comment-13</guid>
		<description>Deteriorata 
(1972 - written by Tony Hendra; music by Christopher Guest)

Go placidly amid the noise and waste,
And remember what comfort there may be in owning a piece thereof.
Avoid quiet and passive persons, unless you are in need of sleep.
Rotate your tires.
Speak glowingly of those greater than yourself,
And heed well their advice, even though they be turkeys.
Know what to kiss, and when.
Consider that two wrongs never make a right, but that three do.
Wherever possible, put people on hold.
Be comforted that in the face of all aridity and disillusionment,
and despite the changing fortunes of time,
There is always a big future in computer maintenance.

You are a fluke of the universe.
You have no right to be here.
And whether you can hear it or not,
The universe is laughing behind your back.

Remember The Pueblo.
Strive at all times to bend, fold, spindle, and mutilate.
Know yourself.
If you need help, call the FBI.
Exercise caution in your daily affairs,
Especially with those persons closest to you -
That lemon on your left, for instance.
Be assured that a walk through the ocean of most souls
Would scarcely get your feet wet.
Fall not in love therefore. It will stick to your face.
Gracefully surrender the things of youth: birds, clean air, tuna, Taiwan.
And let not the sands of time get in your lunch.
Hire people with hooks.
For a good time, call 606-4311. Ask for Ken.
Take heart in the deepening gloom
That your dog is finally getting enough cheese.
And reflect that whatever fortune may be your lot,
It could only be worse in Milwaukee.

You are a fluke of the universe.
You have no right to be here.
And whether you can hear it or not,
The universe is laughing behind your back.

Therefore, make peace with your god,
Whatever you perceive him to be - hairy thunderer, or cosmic muffin.
With all its hopes, dreams, promises, and urban renewal,
The world continues to deteriorate.

Give up!
 
You are a fluke of the universe.
You have no right to be here.
And whether you can hear it or not,
The universe is laughing behind your back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Deteriorata<br />
(1972 - written by Tony Hendra; music by Christopher Guest)</p>
<p>Go placidly amid the noise and waste,<br />
And remember what comfort there may be in owning a piece thereof.<br />
Avoid quiet and passive persons, unless you are in need of sleep.<br />
Rotate your tires.<br />
Speak glowingly of those greater than yourself,<br />
And heed well their advice, even though they be turkeys.<br />
Know what to kiss, and when.<br />
Consider that two wrongs never make a right, but that three do.<br />
Wherever possible, put people on hold.<br />
Be comforted that in the face of all aridity and disillusionment,<br />
and despite the changing fortunes of time,<br />
There is always a big future in computer maintenance.</p>
<p>You are a fluke of the universe.<br />
You have no right to be here.<br />
And whether you can hear it or not,<br />
The universe is laughing behind your back.</p>
<p>Remember The Pueblo.<br />
Strive at all times to bend, fold, spindle, and mutilate.<br />
Know yourself.<br />
If you need help, call the FBI.<br />
Exercise caution in your daily affairs,<br />
Especially with those persons closest to you -<br />
That lemon on your left, for instance.<br />
Be assured that a walk through the ocean of most souls<br />
Would scarcely get your feet wet.<br />
Fall not in love therefore. It will stick to your face.<br />
Gracefully surrender the things of youth: birds, clean air, tuna, Taiwan.<br />
And let not the sands of time get in your lunch.<br />
Hire people with hooks.<br />
For a good time, call 606-4311. Ask for Ken.<br />
Take heart in the deepening gloom<br />
That your dog is finally getting enough cheese.<br />
And reflect that whatever fortune may be your lot,<br />
It could only be worse in Milwaukee.</p>
<p>You are a fluke of the universe.<br />
You have no right to be here.<br />
And whether you can hear it or not,<br />
The universe is laughing behind your back.</p>
<p>Therefore, make peace with your god,<br />
Whatever you perceive him to be - hairy thunderer, or cosmic muffin.<br />
With all its hopes, dreams, promises, and urban renewal,<br />
The world continues to deteriorate.</p>
<p>Give up!</p>
<p>You are a fluke of the universe.<br />
You have no right to be here.<br />
And whether you can hear it or not,<br />
The universe is laughing behind your back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Career Stagnation by PhoneBoy</title>
		<link>http://blog.hact.net/2007/12/13/career-stagnation/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 08:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hact.net/2007/12/13/career-stagnation/#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Maybe there is some way to create a creative outlet at Microsoft? I know I have found ways to do that at Nokia. ;)

I would imagine that a large company like Microsoft encourages or at least tolerates a fair amount of lateral movement. Maybe there's something inside Microsoft more suited to your desires?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe there is some way to create a creative outlet at Microsoft? I know I have found ways to do that at Nokia. <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I would imagine that a large company like Microsoft encourages or at least tolerates a fair amount of lateral movement. Maybe there&#8217;s something inside Microsoft more suited to your desires?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Television Channels are Obsolete by Gabe Wachob</title>
		<link>http://blog.hact.net/2007/12/22/television-channels-are-obsolete/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabe Wachob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 05:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hact.net/2007/12/22/television-channels-are-obsolete/#comment-7</guid>
		<description>Aaron-
   Channels may be irrelevant, but TV shows and series are very much relevant. I watch Battlestar Galactica and Heroes - I actually have to think about which channels they are on, but I don't think twice about watching each and every episode. 

   And I don't care which network the next great show turns up on - hits and duds seem to come pretty evenly across the networks (though Cable networks generally do better). 

   So, in general, I agree - the key is "discovery" - the "networks" should focus on discovering the gestalt of what sort of TV people are interested in and engage them very actively throughout the TV watching experience. And I think the topical/focused networks like SciFi, Comedy Channel, MTV, etc are in a much better position to know their viewers than the broadcast networks which still seem stuck on the myth that the only way to succeed is to try to appeal to everyone (and therefore appeal to no-one).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aaron-<br />
   Channels may be irrelevant, but TV shows and series are very much relevant. I watch Battlestar Galactica and Heroes - I actually have to think about which channels they are on, but I don&#8217;t think twice about watching each and every episode. </p>
<p>   And I don&#8217;t care which network the next great show turns up on - hits and duds seem to come pretty evenly across the networks (though Cable networks generally do better). </p>
<p>   So, in general, I agree - the key is &#8220;discovery&#8221; - the &#8220;networks&#8221; should focus on discovering the gestalt of what sort of TV people are interested in and engage them very actively throughout the TV watching experience. And I think the topical/focused networks like SciFi, Comedy Channel, MTV, etc are in a much better position to know their viewers than the broadcast networks which still seem stuck on the myth that the only way to succeed is to try to appeal to everyone (and therefore appeal to no-one).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ideas: 26 November, 2007 by Innovation through Acquisition &#171; hact</title>
		<link>http://blog.hact.net/2007/11/26/ideas-26-november-2007/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Innovation through Acquisition &#171; hact</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 01:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hact.net/2007/11/26/ideas-26-november-2007/#comment-4</guid>
		<description>[...] UI is only the starting point for what I&#8217;m talking about here. Look at my post from earlier this week and you&#8217;ll find that three of the ideas listed are based on innovating [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] UI is only the starting point for what I&#8217;m talking about here. Look at my post from earlier this week and you&#8217;ll find that three of the ideas listed are based on innovating [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ideation Rationalization by Ian</title>
		<link>http://blog.hact.net/2007/11/24/ideation-rationalization/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 13:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://huslage.wordpress.com/2007/11/24/ideation-rationalization/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Amazing, is yonks since we talked and in your first post to you new space you mention that you and Rich have just been talking about something Imran and I have been trying to figure out recently along with the project Sahara guys over here - essentially nurturing ideas in the community to plug into a self community incubation model. We've been thinking about ideas markets which are good for getting a general zeitgeist impression of the idea quality  but that doesn't allow for the debate and development of ideas - such as upgrading an idea to a specification or project plan.
Love to work on this model with you guys - its about time the four of us found a project!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazing, is yonks since we talked and in your first post to you new space you mention that you and Rich have just been talking about something Imran and I have been trying to figure out recently along with the project Sahara guys over here - essentially nurturing ideas in the community to plug into a self community incubation model. We&#8217;ve been thinking about ideas markets which are good for getting a general zeitgeist impression of the idea quality  but that doesn&#8217;t allow for the debate and development of ideas - such as upgrading an idea to a specification or project plan.<br />
Love to work on this model with you guys - its about time the four of us found a project!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Manifesto by ikisai</title>
		<link>http://blog.hact.net/2007/11/24/the-manifesto/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>ikisai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 11:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://huslage.wordpress.com/2007/11/24/the-manifesto/#comment-2</guid>
		<description>That's a high commitment to make mate but good luck with it, I'll try and help with the ideation too since I've let my own blog die off lately, no promises though !!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a high commitment to make mate but good luck with it, I&#8217;ll try and help with the ideation too since I&#8217;ve let my own blog die off lately, no promises though !!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
